new mixing new logic

The religions of “balance” and relativity.

Accept evil because it’s necessary for the existence of good. Accept pain/destruction because it’s necessary for pleasure/creation. One can not exist without the other.

“relativity” religions and “balance” dogma, are ideologies of those who wish cycles of suffering, toil and destruction to never end.

This kind of literal relativity is a prime example of imaginary thinking pretending to be reality. It uses things like optical illusions to justify it’s self. IE: A specialized picture of a white cup on a black background giving the illusion of 2 black heads facing each other. Remove just the white cup or just the black heads and you remove both the white cup and the black heads. This is an illusion specifically designed to create this phenomenon and outcome. It had to be intentionally made by people and does not represent the natural world. Relativity religions though, say this specialized illusion is universal truth rooted in nature and applies to all subjects of life. It’s “balance” as they call it. A childish generalization and misapplication of context, blindly applying the nature of a made up illusion, to all issues of reality. Directly exploiting the attractive nature of the term “balance” while at the same time bastardizing it’s context.

In spite of the propaganda peddled by such religions, good still exists even if evil does not. For the world is not an illusion. All that is good does not magically disappear if evil is removed and unlike the religious beliefs, it can been physically proven. Good deeds still exist even if evil does not. You do not need evil deeds done against you to understand a good deed done to you. People of relativity religions only pretend the world is an illusion while nothing truly bad is happening to them. Relying on cheep parlor tricks like optical illusions or claiming they have changed metals magically, when all they’ve done is made an amalgam. They also like to change the context of words like “order” and “chaos”, assigning them to good and evil, so they can complete a straw man argument supporting their dogma. All the while in the real world if you take away what they want or mistreat them in ways they can’t stand and they immediately show their hypocrisy, acting as if the physical world is not “just an illusion”.

These kinds of religions insist they are a positive thing, while demanding one ignores the negative effects they have. When evidence of it is brought up, they spout the pseudo intellectual “you just don’t understand” line. This is because they assume and insist all humans share the same lack of critical thinking and deductive reasoning that the religions rely so heavily upon. As if without evil in the world, humans wouldn’t know the difference between right and wrong, pain and pleasure, beneficial and non-beneficial, malevolent and benevolent. Only the wicked, delusional or massively spoiled/sheltered could possibly have any issues differentiating between the 2. One does not need evil in the world to have experienced pain or pleasure. The simple experience of a hard object accidentally falling onto your foot, tells you what you need to know. It’s bad. It feels bad and if someone did it to you intentionally, it’d be even worse.

Relativity based religions make a living finding exceptions to obvious physicality like that though. They pretend the exceptions to the rules are the norm, instead of being the exceptions. Maybe 1 in a 1000 times, the object hitting your foot gets you to duck, therefor avoiding something even worse. It doesn’t change that the 1 in 1000 occurrence is not the norm. It’s universal logic: If you base your expectations of reality on the exceptions, instead of the norm, you will predictably be wrong most of the time. Being proven wrong most of the time by the physical world doesn’t stop theses religions however, thanks to their predictably blind, hypocritical, often oppressive dogmatic structures.

‘Relativity religions’ pose as “enlightened” but in reality are the foundation for protecting evil in the world. They are the basis of false justification for criminal acts, because “evil must be in balance with good”. They are religions of regression not progression. They enable social apathy, restricting people’s ability to act against injustice. Though they would not admit it, these religions do not want free thought or problems solved, whether it be technological, physical, psychical or social. This is because problems “balance” the world, keeping religious hierarchy in a position of authority. These religions wish to convince people that evil and good are 2 sides of the same coin. That good and evil are one. That evil must exist so that good can also exist. That if you remove one, you remove both. This is the rationale of a virus. This is the rationale of savages who burn children alive to appease rain gods or invoke fertility spirits. This is the rationale of the criminally insane and mentally ill.

In this way, these religions guarantee the toil, pain and suffering of human kind will never end. Evil, if defeated, will always be allowed to escape, returning another day to enslave, subvert and destroy all over again. Problems are never allowed to be solved. Viruses never eliminated. Permanent cures never developed. Things built only to be disposed. Peace never made to last, as “true peace” is accepting everything, , , including evil that will stop at nothing to oppress and destroy the world. This “balance” and relativity is the mantra of those who wish cycles of suffering and destruction to never end. More often than not because they are the very same criminals who directly benefit from such cycles. Whether they garb themselves as monks, CEOs or doctors, it is the same ideology at it’s cord. How interesting that 100 years of mainstream science (1920 to 2020) has applied this EXACT religious dogma: “Everything is subject to ‘relativity’”. The same science that developed just as many ways of destruction and apathy, as anything positive or productive. The same science who’s “cures” also cause illness but shouldn’t that be expected? After all a medicine that does as much harm as good, is “balanced”.